| Subject: | Not a simple class. |
| Summary: | Package rating comment |
| Messages: | 3 |
| Author: | Thales Jacobi |
| Date: | 2008-09-24 10:53:19 |
| Update: | 2009-06-23 11:08:09 |
| |
|
|
Thales Jacobi rated this package as follows:
| Utility: | Sufficient |
| Consistency: | Sufficient |
| Documentation: | Insufficient |
| Examples: | Insufficient |
| Unit tests: | Good |
|
|
 Thales Jacobi - 2008-09-24 10:53:19
Not a simple class. Robust but with lots of external classes and independent functions not well explained. Can be used, but there are betters
 G. Miernicki - 2008-11-20 18:37:18 - In reply to message 1 from Thales Jacobi
suggestions for alternatives?
 Guillermo Martínez Jiménez - 2009-06-23 11:08:09 - In reply to message 1 from Thales Jacobi
Agree. Anyway I can't find an alternative. Actually I'm writting some "superclasses" to simplify the use.
|